"pgier" wrote : I believe moving off the thirdparty repository is something that
we still want to do,
|
Yes
anonymous wrote :
| even though my first try was a failure.
|
It wasnt properly validated/tested before it was committed.
anonymous wrote :
| At least I think it helped to flush out some issues that might have otherwise taken
more time to figure out. So the plan going forward is to fix the out of sync
dependencies, and add exclusions to the dependencies where we don't want certain
transitive deps included.
|
| Then of course do additional testing to make sure that the testsuite runs. I'll
plan to post daily updates here, and then send a notification to the dev-list when I'm
ready for the 2nd try at this.
|
Don't get my critisms on the dev-list wrong. The old thirdparty mechanism
has similar issues to Maven. In fact, in some instances it is worse
(e.g. not detecting changes to snapshots or stale artifacts in thirdparty)
It's just that we are used it (so we know how to make it work)
and its configuration has the advantage of having the correct dependencies. ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136762#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...