[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - default-activation-config?

What's the purpose of this? The schema defines it as a different type, but the new metadata classes just use the spec type. This fails, the child is a plain activation-config-property. | Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: {http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee}default-activation-config-property not found as a child of {http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee}default-activation-config | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SundayContentHandler.startElement(SundayContentHandler.java:396) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser$DelegatingContentHandler.startElement(SaxJBossXBParser.java:407) | Also, from what I can tell, it isn't a "default" at all. The default properties override the normal properties. e.g. org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.MDB | | public Map getActivationConfigProperties() | { | HashMap result = new HashMap(); | MessageDriven mdAnnotation = (MessageDriven) resolveAnnotation(MessageDriven.class); | for (ActivationConfigProperty property : mdAnnotation.activationConfig()) | { | addActivationSpecProperty(result, property); | } | | DefaultActivationSpecs defaultSpecsAnnotation = (DefaultActivationSpecs)resolveAnnotation(DefaultActivationSpecs.class); | if (defaultSpecsAnnotation != null) | { | for (ActivationConfigProperty property : defaultSpecsAnnotation.value()) | { | addActivationSpecProperty(result, property); | } | } | | return result; | } | Where addActivationSpecProperty() does a map.put() which replaces things with the same key. I don't see any reason why an annotation (class level) should override the xml (instance level)? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104340#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...