"ravi_eze" wrote :
| hi,
|
| This is w.r.t.
http://labs.jboss.com/jbossremoting/docs/benchmark/performance_benchmark.... where
comparision between diffarent protocols is done. The page also gives the JUnit code that
generated the graphs. we are trying out with 2.5.2. version.
|
| We are evaluating Java RMI and JBoss RMI over socket + Jboss serialization. We see
that Java RMI with Java serialization is always atleast 20% faster than Jboss RMI + socket
+ Jboss serialization.
|
| i am unable to understand the below from the test cases.
|
| 1. The payload uses byte[1024] empty array always. and the object is never
serialized.
| 2. why byte[] as theres not thing there to serialize in it
| 3. Even on using byte[1024] to be sent across using jboss and java rmi we see java rmi
is superior on our machines.
|
| If this is the case then how ar the graphs generated? Or am i missing something very
important. Please help.
|
| --
| ravi
|
Actually, the byte array gets wrapped in some Remoting objects, which do indeed get
serialized.
By "Java RMI with Java serialization" I assume you mean the
"raw_socket" results, or maybe the "raw_rmi" results, and by
"Jboss RMI + socket + Jboss serialization" I assume you mean "socket
transport with jboss serialization". Is that right? If so, then I can't explain
why you're seeing results different than ours. Who knows? Different machines,
different jdk's, etc.
By the way, before I released version 2.4.0.GA, I did a lot of testing and tuning, and, in
the end, the performance of 2.4.0.GA and whatever the latest 2.2.x release was at the time
were very close, within a few percentage points.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4260913#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...