[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Semantics of no local for a durable subscription

Well, if that is true you will have the some strange effects. E.g. Connection conn1 sends message m1 conn1 creates consumer with no local = true. conn1 sends message m2 consumer closes without receiving anything conn1 sends message m3 conn1 creates consumer with no local = false consumer receives m1 consumer receivers m3 (no m2!!) My opinion is that no local should only apply to the *consumer* of the subscription (the subscriber), not the subscription itself, which is the way it currently is and has been for some time, and passes TCK. I just to wanted to clarify since the spec is a bit fuzzy about this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970947#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...