Well, you are right. Toy is not the right word as it is very capable. However, for a web
application framework it is a very basic requirement to be able to handle virtual hosts. I
don't find it very usable for real world applications otherwise...
With that said, I'm still interested in contributing to solving this issue. However, I
don't see much sense in setting of patching without first having a discussion about it
with the portal developers to agree on the main design. For example, we could never agree
on how the portal object tree should look like with virtual host support, which I think is
the main issue. The rest was quite straight forward.
So Julien, could we get in touch regarding working on this issue?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4076019#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...