Using KernelConfigFactory to get KernelConfig (which can provide this)?
Putting KernelConfig instance into Configurator?
It's a 'loop' usage. Looks wrong.
I see we are already using KernelConfig as a parameter.
Doing it the same here (adding it as a parameter in resolveProperty method)?
If I do this (just tried), then almost every method in Configurator needs it. Yuck.
Any other ways / ideas?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4001816#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...