I was thinking the same thing.
The only reason it might be useful to know a component was mapped from an MBean is because
then you'd know the component name is the same as the corresponding MBean's
ObjectName. But in either case, in order to do intelligent queries for components of a
certain type, clients will need to know the exact format of the component name, not just
that it's an ObjectName.
So I agree.
For the Web-related components, maybe use something like:
Web:Application
| Web:ApplicationManager
| Web:Host
| Web:RequestProcessor
| Web:ThreadPool
rather than:
MBean:WebApplication
| MBean:WebApplicationManager
| MBean:WebHost
| MBean:WebRequestProcessor
| MBean:WebThreadPool
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231418#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...