Brian Stansberry [
http://community.jboss.org/people/brian.stansberry] created the
discussion
"Re: Thoughts on filesystem action driven hot deployment"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/593532#593532
--------------------------------------------------------------
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Just for aesthetics, I think the informative markers should be called: deploying,
deployed/failed, undeploying, undeployed.
>
From earlier mail about why this was deliberatly not chosen:
"We did not use .deploy, .deployed as markers since it could cause confusion in
filebrowser that can cut off the ending."
Which actually means we should consider finding better word for undeployed/undeploying...
I knew I'd hear from you about that at some point! ;)
How many characters of uniqueness are needed? You'd need a minimum of 3 if we went
with .undeploying and isundeployed, to distinguish .isdeployed and .isundeployed.
TBH to me this borders on a bikeshed color issue. So, the decision making process for
these file names will be:
1) I will leave it as is, since it's an edge case.
2) If Max has an opinion, I will do what he says.
3) If Dimitris has an opinion and it conflicts with Max's opinion, I will do what
Dimitris says.
Other opinions will be ignored, unless they are persuasive enough to convince either Max
or Dimitris. :)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/593532#593532]
Start a new discussion in JBoss AS7 Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]