"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : We should be deploying a single war file which
should have its urls divided into ebws and http sections (perhaps /ebws/* and /http/* or
more suitable)
|
I'm not a big fan of those url patterns. I would rather see:
http://host/${service.category}/${service.name}
, and for web services specifically (whether they be ebws, the new webservice proxy stuff,
...), I would want the wsdl to be available there also per "?wsdl" convention:
http://host/${service.category}/${service.name}?wsdl
This would be in addition to the contract wsdl urls we have now. In fact, a brainstorm
way for the "?wsdl" to easily work would be for there to be a servlet filter in
the new http gateway that catches anything that ends in "*?wsdl" and request
dispatches over to the existing contract wsdl location, which can be inferred by parsing
the request uri path for /${service.category}/${service.name}.
Thoughts?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4245006#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...