Recent chat between tom and heiko
anonymous wrote :
| Tom
| ----------------
| or can that property of the stakeholder be called role ?
|
| then we do not have the same confusion as we had before
|
| Heiko Braun
| ----------------
| right, we are looking fot the property of a stakeholder
|
| that's what I call the verb
|
| a user or group may be a stakeholder
|
| but it doesn't specify their involvement
|
| Tom Baeyens
| ----------------
| what about just keeping the term role for that property ?
|
| Heiko Braun
| ----------------
| participant and participation is not too bad
|
| USER johndoe PARTCIPATES as CANDIATE
|
| i like this:
|
| taskService.addParticipant(taskDbid, new User("johndoe"),
Participation.CANDIDATE);
|
| Tom Baeyens
| ----------------
| yes
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4210644#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...