"tfennelly" wrote : I haven't prefixed the EBWS endpoints with
"ebws" yet - it's as it was. Do we really want to do this? If we do, then
we need to provide backward compatibility support.
Yes we want to do this. As for backward compatibility, changing the URL is very minor as
there is no functional difference that needs to be worked around. Given the rest of the
changes, and their impact, I would be willing just to document this as a change between
4.6/4.7 & SOA 4/5.
"tfennelly" wrote : If there are specific changes that you feel are not
required, let me know the specific instance(s).
If there is anything that is different from what has previously been discussed then can
you please let me know?
Kev
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246367#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...