"tfennelly" wrote : hehehe, I think we're playing word games again ;-)
|
You'll have to explain that to me one day ;-)
anonymous wrote :
| For sure, the names would be hierarchical and the .esb name would be beside the
service name and not the action name. For what I was suggesting, yes "ESB
Instance" would simply to represented by the name of the .esb. It's already
unique so there's no need to invent another name - and anyway, another name (e.g.
defined in the .esb jboss-esb.xml config) wouldn't help someone trying to track back
from a report to the actual service/action definition.
Agreed. I hadn't thought of the instance name until your posting. If it's there
already we should use it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062347#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...