"jaikiran" wrote :
| A bit of improvement in step#4
| 4) Only if the collection of interceptor classes for this method is non-empty, then go
ahead with the check for @InterceptorOrder. If there are no relevant interceptors for this
method then there's no point in checking the @InterceptorOrder
|
|
I missed the point that @InterceptorOrder is applicable at class level too. So i am not
going to add this "improvement" in step#4.
Other than that, with the rest of the changes, the unit tests in interceptors are
passing.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223655#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...