I understand what you mean Adrian, and if I just had values already in hand to populate
the MetaValue objects I would be golden. :)
The problem really occurs because of our code needs to adapt between complex
MetaValue/MetaType objects and our ProperyMaps and PropertyLists objects.
I need to recurse level by level without knowing any specifics or having the entire
structure of values in hand. I need to have the MetaValue object with the structure there
so I can generally recurse through the complex object and create correct types within the
structure. Then set values.
I have a long workaround that is currently working. However, having the ability to create
an empty complex MetaValue object would save a lot of extra work.
Now, I think we can wait though on this and see how things work out, to see if the current
code I have causes any issues.
Thanks Adrian
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4128402#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...