That still sounds potentially too coarse. I would look at the cache as message oriented
tree where a usage context has to bind a serialization manager to obtain a typed view of
the cache data. When there are puts/gets to the cache, it needs to be done through the
context "connection" to the cache messaging layer that has the correct
serialization manager.
I view a deployment wanting their own cache as wanting their own typed view, and
namespace, but they may want to automagically integrate into the deployment env transport
that binds distributed cache contexts together. Not overriding the transport/clustered
configuration gets into being able to take a deployment and have it inherrit aspects of
its environment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989494#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...