Tom Jenkinson [
http://community.jboss.org/people/tomjenkinson] created the discussion
"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/632764#632764
--------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, possibly, I wonder how much space we are going to save, but yeah, I can take a look
at that. That said, what size should we be looking at aiming for allowing node names? At
the moment, it is possible that 14 bytes is enough to encode the node name? David, what
should be aiming to allow size wise for a remoting node name?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/632764#632764]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]