Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [Management Development] - ProfileService SPI impacts of domain.xml

David Lloyd [http://community.jboss.org/people/david.lloyd%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion "ProfileService SPI impacts of domain.xml" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/538368#538368 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry for the late reply. I think that when you talk about mapping the admin DSL to deployment metadata, you're reaching into implementation details.  It's very conceivable than in a reasonable alternate implementation, deployments like the threads deployment wouldn't even *have* any metadata.  It would be much more efficient to directly read XML and spit out BeanMetaData objects, for example.  The only reason we have metadata at all for threads, logging, I/O, etc. is because we're constrained to use JBossXB for this - it would be a serious mistake to think of this as a requirement.  The whole concept of having deployment metadata of any sort might *sound* like a design philosophy or paradigm, but it's really just a coincidence of implementation. The real paradigm which is actually in use today basically amounts to a DSL which is *not* some kind of serialized representation of the running state of the system; it is an *imperitive* command language which describes a series of services which are to be started.  However everything that has been described under the heading of domain.xml is descriptive of *additional configuration* which is applied atop a running system.  The two models are basically orthogonal, and we should not be trying to solve both with one uniform solution - you're going to end up with either a stunted deployment DSL or an overly complex administration DSL. I think it's important to think about this from the perspective that the deployment and admin DSLs are two different user interfaces for two different purposes and stop thinking about implementation details until the expected semantics are clear, which, judging from this and other threads, is still a bit of a question mark. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/538368#538368] Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]