[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: MetaValue representation of javax.management.ObjectNames
"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : The type on the underlying mbean is ObjectName,
so either we could create a ObjectNameMetaValueHandler to simplify the building/viewing of
the CompositeValue, or make use of the ManagementProperty.marshallerFactory() to map the
ObjectName to/from a string MetaValue. This later bit does not seem tested, so I'll
have to look at that.
|
| In terms of the values not being set, I'll update our JmsDestinationUnitTestCase
to set these values and assert that they are not null.
|
How about using a MetaMapper for transforming ObjectNames, as this already exists.
something like:
| public class ObjectNameMetaMapper extends MetaMapper<ObjectName>
| {
|
| @Override
| public MetaType getMetaType()
| {
| return SimpleMetaType.STRING;
| }
|
| @Override
| public MetaValue createMetaValue(MetaType metaType, ObjectName object)
| {
| return SimpleValueSupport.wrap(object.getCanonicalName());
| }
|
| @Override
| public ObjectName unwrapMetaValue(MetaValue metaValue)
| {
| return internalUnwrap(metaValue);
| }
| }
|
And add a static mapping to the MetaMapper for that, as this seems to be a common use
case?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191475#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...