Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Annotation based Action classes

Keith Babo [http://community.jboss.org/people/kcbabo] replied to the discussion "Annotation based Action classes" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/548756#548756 -------------------------------------------------------------- Do we need another name field?  Here's what we will have with the current proposal: o The @Process annotation gives you the freedom to name the action method whatever you want.  It could be process(), lookupCustomerId(), pinkFluffyBunnies(), ... o The action defintiion in jboss-esb.xml already has a (required) name attribute.  The tooling can use this value to display a user friendly name. So what do we gain from adding the name field to the @Process annoation? `k. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/548756#548756] Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]