That is a good point. I think although we have designed FQN class to allow non string fqns
so much JBC code relies on the fact that fqns are strings. We should be clear about the
fact that only string fqns are acceptable. Manik?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983856#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...