"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I guess the question Is what is the reason why you define these classes against | the user classloader instead of having one implementation against the jboss-aop | classloader or even the system classloader? | I'd further guess that it doesn't really matter (unless you had some name mangling scheme) since in the old UCL mechanism the first classloader to have these classes would always be used to load the classes. In fact, that would potentially be a memory leak if that first classloader got redeployed while other classloaders were sharing those classes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204764#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...