"alesj" wrote : "david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | AssembledDirectory shouldn't be needed anymore with the new design (there is only one view of the VFS and that's the fully assembled view). | | | | MemoryFileFactory should be replaced with an alternative API... right now it all needs to be explicit (make a temp dir, mount the temp dir in the real VFS, and use getPhysicalFile() to make modifications). I think a static method might be a good idea to do this automatically though. | | | I only need this API for back-compatibility. | How it's implemented in the back, I don't care. | But not having this would mean huge changes to MC testing, | as a lot CL, Deployers, WB, ... tests depends on it. | | You can definitely deprecate it, and write better suited API to the new VFS API. If you want to add it back in, be my guest - it just means putting off the same work until later though. Except then it will probably be even more difficult since more time will pass allowing the API to become even more entrenched. We intended to change or remove the tests (some of the tests seem to exist only to test this feature; it would be strange to add the feature just to make those tests work). As for the other stuff, the temp file API needs to be fixed up a bit to allow for those components to be ported (remember that this is an unfinished prototype). I think the quick/easy fix would be a mistake here. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246497#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...