&quot;kabir.khan(a)jboss.com&quot; wrote : FULL POST... | Thanks, I will look into that. I think that answers a lot of the other questions I was about to ask. | | However, I also need to be able to have | | | <aop> | | </aop> | | | | at the top level so that I can support deployments similar to the current -aop.xml. Do you have any tips on how to achieve that? | | Something like: | @JBossXmlSchema(elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.UNQUALIFIED) | public class AOPDeployment extends AbstractKernelDeployment | { | } | Although I don't think Alex has put much testing into unqualified schemas in JBossXB so you might want to force people to update their xml to use a namespace? | @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:aop:2.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED) | | <aop xmlns="urn:jboss:aop:2.0"> | </aop> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131097#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...