"alesj" wrote : | Uf. :-) | btw: why not? | Because its unnecessary busy work. What's the point of a multi-container kernel if you don't use multiple container types? 'ales' wrote : | It can't. :-) | It can only demand whatever with legacy 'demand' element. | I have no objections with moving demand/supply notion to our dependency module. Although this bloats simple 'state machine' impl in dependency. If supply/demand are to be mc bean specific it simply cannot be used as a cross-container mechanism. It seems like this can be replaced with a dependency on an alias, in which case, that is how the mc supply/demand should be implemented. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4100473#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...