The constructor should be reinstated. It's not allowed to throw backwards
compatibility out the door just like that.
The old constructor should use some transitional code to call upon the new constructor
(preferably with some deprecation warnings).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156218#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...