Emanuel Muckenhuber [
http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the
discussion
"To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/536496#536496
--------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Stansberry wrote:
The part of our existing profile discussion I was thinking of was what's shown here:
http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14742 http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14742.
Basically a fairly compact listing of required capabilities, an indication of where a
deploy directory is (which could perhaps be defaulted). Then add stuff like
jdbc-resources, jms-resources, threads, etc. That's pretty end-user-oriented; the
heavy implementation detail stuff is in
http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14743
http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14743.
If we didn't need the required capabilities bit (e.g. could infer them from the rest
of domain.xml content), that's nice. But I don't know if we can do that, not if we
allow a deploy dir with contents not fully specified in domain.xml.
Having this part of the domain model was basically the reason why i tried to separate
"user configuration" from the server side module configuration. We can obviously
also change the names in the configuration files, to make things a more obvious.
In the end - I think if you configure clustering it would make sense to also deploy the
needed service. Where you definitely should not care about which deployments are needed
for this. Since we are going to have a domain specific model - each fragment could export
a requirement on a module.
But, yes - in case we have don't have this part of a separate "module" and
deployments are still in deploy dirs, then this would not make much sense.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/536496#536496]
Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]