It may be redundent in terms of the repo structure, but you said this also determines the
artifact name. common-core.jar vs jboss-common-core.jar is a good use of the jboss prefix,
so that redundency is a good thing. I suppose it could be reintroduced by overriding the
artifact name via a combination of groupId and artifactId.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010087#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...