"emuckenhuber" wrote : | It most probably should be part of the AS integration, as we only add it to the DU we don't need the deployers to depend on it as well. | Yes, sounds even better. e.g. other AS components could just rely on it, w/o knowing anything about Papaki. "emuckenhuber" wrote : | We could also add some simple deployers to the 5_x branch - at least generating a empty ScanningMetaData for isMetaDataComplete() does not require Papaki. This could speed up legacy deployments quite a bit, as we wouldn't process the already scanned annotations anyway. | I think ScottM already did something similar. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255108#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...