"timfox" wrote : "clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : The idea is to get a new connection, but keep the actual delegates we are using. | | | | I see what you are doing. You want to re-use the old delegate instance - in which case you need to change the ids. | | Having said that, why do you want to keep the old delegates? Why not just create new ones? Then you won't have to change any ids - I would have thought this would be simpler and it's what I imagined when I thought this through. That's was my first idea, to repalce delegates. But it was easier to just replace the ID instead of replacing eventually listeners and things like that. If I wanted to repalce the entire delegate I would have more data to replace (think about listeners), consequently more space for errors. Replacing the ID was just easier. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978883#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...