"flavia.rainone(a)jboss.com" wrote : (...)I guess I'll create a JBossClDelegatingCPRepository (BTW, maybe we should refactor those names? On a separate note, as it is today, the jboss-classpool project contains several legacy classpools, that were useful for previous classloader models. I've kept those intact because the plan is to port the refactoring I've done on JBoss AOP (JBAOP-742) to JBoss AOP's trunk. For that, I would like to have Kabir's validation on JBAOP-742 refactoring and on the removal of some classpools. IMO the only classpool we should keep, besides JBossClDelegatingCP, is the unified class loader compatible (plus some helper CPs, such as Temp CPs). The other classpools, such as JBoss5ClassPool, are never used and I I think they could be removed. That would greatly simplify jboss-classpool project. And, on a next level, once this code cleanup is complete, I wonder if we can find a shorter name for JBossClDelegatingCP and a simpler CP hierarchy for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265325#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...