"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I know you're probably scared of me telling you did it wrong after the fact, | but now I'll tell you that you are asking a stupid question before the fact. :-) | Could be, but I think it's again the case of 'me explaining what I want badly'. :-) See below for more details. "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Isn't it obvious that PropertyInfo is the contract and AbstractPropertyInfo | is an implementation detail? | Really? I thought I was missing some conclusion after 2 years of work on MC? :-) "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | There should be some refactoring like; | | | public abstract class AbstractPropertyInfo implements PropertyInfo { String name } | | public class StandardPropertyInfo extends AbstractPropertyInfo { MethodInfo getter, MethodInfo setter } | | public class FieldPropertyInfo extends AbstractPropertyInfo { FieldInfo field } | | | Already got exactly all this in place. ;-) OK, let me try once more to explain what I see as an issue. ... Eh, during thinking what I wanted to ask/write, I understood what I really needed to do. So, yes, we can call my previous post again a bad explanation. Since I see I couldn't explain it even to myself at that time. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136752#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...