I originally found it with a standalone enum.
I've reported it as a bug. I did find a bug report that asked
for the opposite in apt (don't show the synthetic parameters)
so I guess they hacked the compiler to not annotate the class properly. :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4008879#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...