The tests cannot be renamed in that fashion because testname(security-manager) is not a valid java package name. Tests that require a specific configuration should have a distinct naming convention that excludes them from the less selective runs. Tests that can be run under multiple configurations should use the junit.configuration value to distinguish the run. In general it looks like we need to go through the duplicates and determine if its because of poor names or poor exclusion filters. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017778#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...