Emanuel Muckenhuber [
http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the
discussion
"To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/536534#536534
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Greene wrote:
In the discussion we had at the OA&M meeting with the JON folks, we thought that the
AS perspective of management ends with the domain . "Multi-domain" management
was something that JON would offer, as a compelling difference. So our admin console, cli,
and domain.xml interfaces would be limited to a domain. I still think this is the
"right" approach.
Yes, limiting to a domain seems the right approach. But
are we sure that a domain should manage a heterogenous group?
Let's put it another way - should embedded jopr manage a heterogenous group? Where is
the value addon from JON? How likely is it that you have multiple heterogenous
configurations within a company? Isn't that just only a small percentage where you
would need that?
Grouping obviously seems to be a important. Where having a heterogenous configuration
within a domain, makes this quickly quite big and complex. Splitting that up in smaller
"manageable units", which have more in common than "just" a domain
name - with clearer boundaries/responsibilities could help to make it easier to understand
and reduce overall complexity.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/536534#536534]
Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]