Emanuel Muckenhuber [http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the discussion "domain.xml work" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/535175#535175 -------------------------------------------------------------- Yeah, "profileservice" should not be mentioned in namespace, unless it's actually something directly provided through profileservice. The reason for having new namespaces for everything is more a modulartiy and plugability concern. Where we could connect a namespace to a module providing this "management feature" or parsing capability - where we don't require a static @XmlRoot any more. Also thinking about how our other platforms (SOA, Portal) and optional addons on top of AS could extend this model and provide their own fragments. We could also think of deferring the actual xml binding until a module is loaded and the classes are available, so that we don't have to have everything on the bootstrap classpath. For the moment we are going to use a static model and see how far we can push this - trying to get a clearer picture about the meta data operations needed and validate that we have a way to properly persist changes back to the domain.xml. Both will most likely influence how the DomainModel is going to look like in the end. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/535175#535175] Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]