"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : That's clearly a step in the right direction. But I don't like that you have to explicitly add that namespace. I would assume that xi:include should behave the same way as if you would have that piece of text directly written in the original - where you don't need extra namespace. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157298#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...