"ALRubinger" wrote : | The groupId might change eventually too, who knows? I'd say let's just keep the naming until we know the intent of the project IMO. | I'm not sure if you mean "naming" specifically with respect to maven, or if you're saying "leave the package names alone". "ALRubinger" wrote : | Because it didn't *need* to be public, so I scoped it down as small as possible. :) By convention lately I've been doing this so that I can have tests in the same packages and get at package-private members. | Ah, thanks. I guess it doesn't matter, as long as you're not in AS/testsuite. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267400#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...