"kurt.stam(a)jboss.com" wrote : I've been looking at the donated cbr code (see http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=86937, thx for that btw :)) and I think that for us to use it we need to make the following changes: | | 1. Technology: | a. upgrade to the latest JBossRules (3.x) | b. move towards the new java-like rules definition | c. move to a plain java implementation | | 2. Integration | a. Name the CBR as an action and define a processor for it, or in the architecture to come, | Sounds very like Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ;-) anonymous wrote : | define the CBR as a Service and register it's ServiceBinding in the Registry | I'm not sure if it would be a service or some logic within the dispatcher, which could use an external service I suppose. anonymous wrote : | b. Add the CBR action as a (routing) action in the action chain. | | 3. Questions | a. Should the CBR service return a service/action name, or should it actually forward the message straight to it. | Can you go through the scenario you have in mind? anonymous wrote : | b. Do we support routing to one or multiple destinations for the next release? | One would be a good start. anonymous wrote : | c. Our messages are either of type Serializable or XML, will we support the content based routing of both types (or just XML)? | Since the message formats can be extended arbitrarily and at runtime, I'd expect the CBR implementation to be suitable extensible too. We provide necessary plugins to support the out-of-the-box message formats we have, and use an architecture that allows others to add their own CBR-handlers at runtime. anonymous wrote : | d. What happens when no rules match? Do we have to create a 'catch all' rule, or is it ok to return 'sorry'. What will happen next? Will the message simply go to the next action? | | Dave I'd love to hear your, or anyone elses, thoughts on any of this. | | --Kurt | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3980637#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...