"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| Especially if vfsmemory could have a specifiable authority name. Hint hint. :-)
No. ;-)
I think having separate protocol for remoting and in-memory is better concept wise.
We could independently develop features, but not over doing it on the API.
And I guess we'll have to depend on JBoss Remoting for vfs remoting,
where in-memory is dependency free.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191564#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...