Andrew Rubinger [
http://community.jboss.org/people/ALRubinger] replied to the discussion
"ejb3_1 and its relation with ejb3 bom"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/536621#536621
--------------------------------------------------------------
jaikiran pai wrote:
As such, I think that the ejb3 bom as-6 should be the parent for the ejb3_1 module. That
way, the ejb3_1 module pom will just declare the dependencies and let the parent bom
declare the dependency versions.
I think this is good, though there's something
worthy of noting here.
If the BOM is the parent of the ejb3_1 module, then the ejb3_1 module will have the
correct exported dependencies. Now something else, project X, makes a depedendency upon
ejb3_1. Any "exclusion"s defined by the BOM will be *ignored*. This is because
Project X doesn't have the BOM in its hierarchy. The way around this is to declare in
Project X a dependency twice upon ejb3_1; once in "dependencies", once in
"dependencyManagement" (with scope import).
S,
ALR
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/536621#536621]
Start a new discussion in EJB 3.0 Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]