"vickyk" wrote : We need something generic as this | https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/ | | I think the existing JMS ra can be generic but is based on many assumptions . | Looks like this thread is diverging into several different topics 1) Implementation of a JBM specific RA using an internal API. This is really a sub project of JBM and won't happen until JBM 2.0 2) Fixing the instanceof bug in the current pseudo-generic JMS RA. 3) Improving the current pseudo-generic resource JMS RA to work with providers that don't provide a connection consumer. Looks like the glassfish one deals with this by doing synchonrous receives. I would suggest each of these are spun off into separate threads... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142295#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...