I fixed that exception. It was a new for loop that snuck in. I don't know why the
simpler semantics don't also include checking for null and just bypassing the loop.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971964#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...