"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | don't write another, that's just | | NIH syndrome. | This is relative (like everything in this world). My point of view on NIH is nice expressed here. | I don't consider MC as NIH comparing to Spring, because it's critical project for JBoss/RH. | For the same reason I don't consider X2JB NIH because its critical for my projects because I need to: | | * have the full control over the XML->Java binding process | * have the full control over the code to do architectural changes | * have the full control of X2JB project lifecycle (to fix/release immediately) | | I don't have that kind of control over the JAXB nor XMLBeans thus I'm not going to use | JBossXB, JAXB, XMLBeans and other binding frameworks neither now nor in the future. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4241053#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...