"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Why don't you call the project dependency-rules? | Then later you can have a dependency-jbpm or dependency-xxxx Hmm, I like your idea, perhaps only the name dependency is not quite right, since it's not a clear extension of the dependency module - like your deployers, where every deployers-sub-module is extension of previous. In my case I have mixture of all MC modules - dependency, kernel, aop, deployers, ... Is reliance-rules, reliance-xxxx, ... still ok? Currently I'll split them into three things I have done: (a) reliance-identity (b) reliance-rules (depends on (a)) (c) reliance-jbpm (wip) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080512#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...