anonymous wrote : | The JMX integration should be a layer independent of the core class. | Definitely a +1. Hate the hard-coded MBean interfaces in the 1.x series. :-) anonymous wrote : | Manik, one thing this implies is a compile-time dependency in JBC on the microcontainer jars. I think that was an inevitability anyway. We could avoid this by having the JMX integration in the AS cluster module or the fledgling cluster project, but that seems ugly. | Yes, I see this as an inevitability too. anonymous wrote : | There's still legacy code in TreeCache that let's TreeCache register itself w/ JMX; I'll remove that tomorrow once others get a chance to read this thread and express any opinions. | +1 from me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984156#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...