anonymous wrote : | Question: Is there any benefit to the Profile Service and/or management tools from the name="xxx" attribute on the ServiceBinding beans? If they can be anonymous, configuration will be simpler. | As far as the profile service is concerned, it is upto the ServiceBindingManager to provide a ManagedObject to the profile service that allows any management console to understand how to configure it. This should include properties or ManagedObjects that let you configure the store/configuration file as well. The only reason to give a special name would be so a management console can identify it and give it some extra prominance or categorization, but that only needs to be done on the ManagedObject. The implementation details of the POJO should largely be hidden. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169053#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...