See JBTM-253.
JBossTS opens a bunch of network ports (three, I think, but debug output only mentions
two) it listens on, but JBossTS does not give me the option to specify at which address it
listens for connections.
As such, this is not a bug or error. However, standard practice in practically every
single network listening software is to give the option for the administrator to specify
at which address the software listens on. JBoss AS also gives this option, it even has a
global system property jboss.bind.address, and every single service except JBossTS can be
separately configured to listen on a particular address, and by default the services
usually are configured to listen on ${jboss.bind.address}.
I want to see JBossTS also support this.
My ultimate reason for this is simply the fact that I hate to have services listening
globally on ports they have no business or need listening on. Of course my servers are
firewalled, so there's no problem of getting rogue connections, but even so, if
I'm running a simple single JBoss AS instance, nothing will ever need to connect to
JBossTS services from outside of the localhost, then I want to configure JBossTS so that
it listens only on localhost.
But really, for complex installations there may be even real reasons why this needs to be
configured. The server could have multiple IP addresses, run several JBoss instances, and
would need to configure JBossTS in each instance to listen on different IP.
From another point of view, I could ask that if JBossTS does not need
to support this configuration option, why would any service in JBoss support it, and why
does JBossTS support configuring even the port at all, if listen address configuration
need not be supported (these two really always go hand in hand).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063814#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...