Tom wrote :
| in any case, the parallelism and condition evaluation should go in the
leaveBpmnActivity. so that by default, each outgoing transition is evaluated and forked if
the condition resolves to true.
|
Exactly, this is what I think as well.
I will just set a variable "outcome" in the UserTaskActivity.signal method with
the value of the signalName? BPMN spec doesn't say anything about it (or I missed it).
I think this is a good solution at least for the moment, what do you think?
Tom wrote :
| But we can also consider adding a BpmnService which allows the user to enter
"BPMN" messages that the engine has to react to. This way we can offer the real
BPMN terminology to the BPMN users.
|
I would wait if we see the demand for it. For the moment I think the bigger advantage is
to have the same API for BPMN or jPDL.
If we want to leverage full BPMN vocabulary we still can write that facade...
Ronald wrote :
| wow, we have a noob here in the forum... ;-)
|
Jajaja ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246884#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...