"alesj" wrote : | OK, I'll then put the getScopeMetaData/isEmpty ugliness into RetrievalBridge. :-) | public MetaData getScopeMetaData(ScopeKey scopeKey) | { | if (scopeKey == null) | throw new IllegalArgumentException("Null scope key"); | | if (retrieval instanceof MetaDataContext) | { | MetaDataContext context = (MetaDataContext)retrieval; | List<MetaDataRetrieval> matchingRetrievals = new ArrayList<MetaDataRetrieval>(); | List<MetaDataRetrieval> localRetrievals = context.getLocalRetrievals(); | for (MetaDataRetrieval localRetrieval : localRetrievals) | { | if (scopeKey.equals(localRetrieval.getScope())) | matchingRetrievals.add(localRetrieval); | } | if (matchingRetrievals.isEmpty() == false) | return new MetaDataRetrievalToMetaDataBridge(new AbstractMetaDataContext(context, matchingRetrievals)); | } | else if (scopeKey.equals(retrieval.getScope())) | return new MetaDataRetrievalToMetaDataBridge(new AbstractMetaDataContext(retrieval)); | return null; | } | | public boolean isEmpty() | { | return retrieval.isEmpty(); | } | This is what I've pushed in (also added MetaDataRetrieval.isEmpty()). I think it should do the trick. But if I want to remove the hack with joinpoint being ControllerContext aware, I need to get the context's name from somewhere. | ScopeKey instanceKey = new ScopeKey(CommonLevels.INSTANCE, "<context_name>"); | MetaData instanceMetaData = metaData.getScopeMetaData(instanceKey); | if (instanceMetaData != null && instanceMetaData.isEmpty() == false) | { | return true; | } | Perhaps put in in the MetaData under 'ControllerContext.name' name? And push in/out this info in KernelControllerContextAction.dispatchJoinPoint invocation? Or just simply put in in for good when we first create MetaData for context - in PreInstallAction? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080904#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...