Emanuel Muckenhuber [http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the discussion "ProfileService SPI impacts of domain.xml" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/536509#536509 -------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, i think using the domain configuration for this would make sense. In the end that's what matters. A clearer separation between configuration and runtime is something missing. In the end "configuration" is what should be exposed based on the domain model and then we can look at merging runtime MOs into a composite MO - so configuration always maps back to the domain model. For runtime objects we just provide value dispatching, no persistence. So i think that full out of the box configuration support for BeanMetaData - like we have it now. Where we overwrite the MO view with the actual pojo MO view and then update BMD, is something out of the scope. It also requires classloading so that we can actually build the pojo view. However we should be able to add better support for e.g. BeanMetaDataFactories - since we basically provide a domain specific metadata to another domain specific metadata. So the domain thread pool metadata to the actual thread pool metadata bean factory. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/536509#536509] Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]